18 January 2013

Who is the Real Paul Farmer?

An article by freelance journalist Ansel Herz for Counterpunch recounts his meetings with the PIH co-founder over the past few years to tell of a Farmer who has become the "useful idiot" for Bill Clinton and the UN.
“Oh, he adores Clinton,” a senior member of Partner in Health, told me as our plane approached the Haitian coastline. “I don’t get it.” 
It was March 2012. By chance, our seats on the flight to Port-au-Prince happened to be next to each other. We’d struck up a conversation. 
She said Paul had changed over the years and that now she represents the “left-wing of PIH.” But the organization had taken a decidedly non-political turn. 
I told her how disappointing it was when PIH had refused to sign on to a petition to protect Haiti’s displaced from forced evictions not long after the quake. She wasn’t surprised. 
The petition was addressed to Bill Clinton, the UN Envoy to Haiti, among other authorities. And Clinton is “close to Paul,” the petitioners were told by Donna Barry, PIH’s Advocacy and Policy Director.
Herz cites examples of Farmer softening prior stances. Farmer opposed plans to provide low-paying textile jobs and was critical of the growth of NGOs in Haiti. However, he now is more silent on the labor issue and Herz describes attending a fundraiser for the start up NGO Students of the World where Farmer delivered remarks.



Sources within the PIH circle and other observers are not named, but they offer critical reflections on Farmer. In the final section, Herz recounts confronting Farmer on the charges of being silenced and used.
Farmer eventually disclaimed any leadership role, saying, “I’m really not a UN official. I don’t have any obligations.” 
“On the second year anniversary [of the quake] I wrote what I had to say and I don’t really have any more to say.” 
When I said he had lost the razor-sharp critical voice from Uses of Haiti, he said, “I hope you’re wrong about that.”
Farmer sits on the board of the Institute for Justice and Democracy in Haiti (IJDH), the very same group that is suing the UN over the cholera outbreak in Haiti. Farmer has been noticeably silent on the issue, but defended his support of IJDH when confronted by Herz noting in the conversation, “I’ve never worked in any social justice organization where there aren’t serious disagreements inside.”

Note: I feel it important to add that I am taking a decidedly middle stance on this discussion. The point is to highlight the thrust of the argument for those who might miss it. Herz raises some questions that are worth considering, but there are a lot of things that take place behind closed doors that are hard to account. The reason for sharing this because it is one of the first verbalizations of mummers I have heard for a few years. Aid workers and media are asking some of these questions. So there is value in the ideas becoming a part of a large discussion. However, the very first question should be if this is overblown, just right, or understated.

7 comments:

DJean47 said...

I really don't get it. Why do we have to turn a doctor into a political figure?


What's the argument here? That he has not sided with the Haitians enough? I'm curious about the author of that piece. What does he want from Farmer? Is he not 'leftist' enough?


If the point is that Farmer doesn't care enough for the plight of the Haitian people, would the author like to compare credentials?


There is little if any evidence presented that suggests farmer has been anything but dedicated to saving lives. The author? He's apparently lived in Haiti -- I'm sure he's since gone back to his well-heeled life in the US -- and therefore is qualified to make sweeping generalizations, based on unnamed sources, that there's been a shift at PIH.

The article contradicts itself as well. The author claims Port-au-Prince camp dwellers have never heard of him, yet if he's read the book, he surely knows that Farmer is focused on the rural poor and was doing his thing long before tracy kidder came along. OK, so in the writer's imagination, he's a nobody in Haiti. So why is his voice needed in a petition that went nowhere to begin with?


Give me a break. In a country filled with corruption, there are surely more important fish to fry.

ansel said...

I'm the author. I'm in Haiti right now, not in the States, thanks. That's why it says PORT-AU-PRINCE at the start of the article.

Farmer is a political figure, whether you like it or not. He has a political position - UN Deputy Envoy to Haiti (the UN has a controversial peacekeeping force here) - and he's written highly political articles and books before. That's part of what's always made him more than just a doctor. The question is what his politics are now. If you look at Tom's article in Foreign Policy on the unfunded, recycled cholera initiative, then even from a health-only perspective, you can't help but wonder why he's involved.

As I said on Twitter, Farmer had accomplished much more than me by my age. I wouldn't want to be compared to him, nor should I be. I don't do the same kind of work. This piece was meant to start a conversation and in that it seems to have been successful.

DJean47 said...

First, character assassination via anonymous sources is journalism's biggest act of cowardice.
Second, I don't even know who you are, why would you assume I read your Twitter account?
Third, I can see your point on Farmer being considered a political figure based on his writings, but I disagree about the UN position making him a political figure. Do you consider Mia Farrow a political figure? I also disagree with your assumption that being the deputy envoy to Haiti, which is a bullshit honorary title, gives Farmer the power to call the shots at the UN on projects like the cholera initiative. That seems pretty naive.
Lastly, if your intent was to start a conversation, which, I'd agree, it has, why would you quote someone calling him a useful idiot? I'm assuming you do know that infers that Farmer is unaware what those manipulating him are up to. That seems more like an attack than a conversation start. Do you really believe Farmer is clueless about Bill Clinton's intentions or the role of the UN? I know those weren't your words, but choosing to include that quote was your choice.

Tom Murphy said...

I will jump in here to say that I do think Farrow is a political figure. She was an important campaigner for the Darfur movement and was a leading force in applying pressure on China in the lead up to the '08 Olympics for its continued trade and support of the Bashir regime.


Personally, I don't see that as something that is to be weighed as good or bad. Her position is not only to call attention to issues, but to push public policy to address those issues. She is much in the same area as say George Clooney and Sean Penn who have both made trips to The Hill to lobby for their campaigns as well as seek out public support.

DJean47 said...

Fair enough, perhaps she is. But merely receiving the title doesn't make her so, I'd say. I think Ansel's suggestion about Farmer's writings is more to point.
You mention Sean Penn. Is there anyone on this planet more deserving of a critical article? I read the Rolling Stone article, but the coverage he's received, in general, has been glowing.

Tom Murphy said...

I agree on Penn, though I have heard some good things about his organization's work. Would require some time to really gain an understanding on what is happening by a person who is there to investigate rather than write a glowing profile. Maybe Ansel is the right person.

Cindy said...

Do our jobs define who we are. Click www.gofastek.com for more information.

Cindy
www.gofastek.com

All Time Hits